Sentiment Analysis with Python & NLP
1. Project Overview
Natural Language Processing (NLP) is one of the most exciting fields in Data Science. In this project, I utilize the NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) library to build a Sentiment Analyzer.
While advanced Transformer models like Cardiff's Twitter-RoBERTa offer state-of-the-art accuracy, they require heavy computational resources (GPUs) and large download sizes. For rapid analysis of social media text or customer reviews where speed is critical, rule-based models like VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner) remain highly effective.
2. The Logic: How VADER Works
VADER is a lexicon and rule-based sentiment analysis tool that is specifically attuned to sentiments expressed in social media. It doesn't just look at "good" or "bad" words; it understands the context:
- Polarity: Every word in the lexicon is rated between -4 (Negative) and +4 (Positive).
- Intensity: It accounts for boosters (e.g., "really good" is stronger than "good").
- Negation: It understands that "not bad" is actually positive.
- Punctuation: "Great!!!" scores higher than "Great".
3. Python Implementation
Below is the Python code used to implement this analysis in a production environment (e.g., a Jupyter Notebook or Backend Server).
from nltk.sentiment import SentimentIntensityAnalyzer
# Download the VADER lexicon (Run once)
nltk.download('vader_lexicon')
# Initialize the Analyzer
sia = SentimentIntensityAnalyzer()
def get_sentiment(text):
scores = sia.polarity_scores(text)
compound = scores['compound']
if compound >= 0.05:
return "Positive 😊"
elif compound <= -0.05:
return "Negative 😠"
else:
return "Neutral 😐"
# Example Usage
sample_text = "I absolutely love this new feature! It's amazing."
print(get_sentiment(sample_text))
4. Live Interactive Demo
Since this portfolio is hosted on GitHub Pages (a static environment), we cannot run the Python server above. However, I have implemented a Custom JavaScript Logic that mimics the VADER algorithm right here in your browser.
Type any sentence below to test the model's logic in real-time. Try "TERRIBLE", "Amazing", or "Not bad".